Essays

I was waiting for the bus for an interminable amount of time today in front of the Asia Institute offices. When I had had enough, I happened to glance down at the bench and spotted this this short note scrawled on its surface.

It read:

“Although we believe that the troubles of today somehow will pass away, why is it that we do not want to believe that the happiness we are enjoying right now will also pass away like a dream?”

The phrase struck me as particularly significant. A rip in the surface of things that forced me to think a bit about the tremendous depth of this daily life I toss away in my rush to create some better future.

Here is a typical image of a fashionable woman that can be found in Korean advertising. In this particularly case, fashion is the product. But the important feature is spiritual, not visual. I want to ask you, if you can imagine how this woman would think and behave.

Would she strive to reduce poverty and injustice in our society? Would she take a deep interest in the well being of working people in her community? Would she give generously to environmental movements and do everything in her power to reduce waste?

Ultimately, we do not know, but the surface appearance given is one of radical elitism, of a smooth detachment and a complete indifference to the fate of our society and our biosphere. I find more and more advertisements that employ this particular posture  popping up in Seoul and they disturb me deeply. To think that  young girls may be thinking about such a posture as an ideal is tragic, if not criminal, in terms of its greater implications for  humanity.

Here is an advertisement for vacationing in Bali that I saw in the subway last week. What I find so disturbing about this image, and many like it, is that the people and the culture of Bali are completely cut out of the picture. It is a banal luxury setting that could just as well be in Cancun or Tahiti. Once I thought that the whole point of travel was to encounter other cultures and peoples. And also to contribute to the local economy. In this case, however, one has no opportunity for any interaction and most likely there is no benefit to the local economy either.

Yes, I am not making it up. This is what I saw in the window of a local pet store. I guess if owners can swill it, so can pooches. I have not tried the brew myself, but you might want to pick up a six-pack next weekend for the pack.

Yes, you must admit there is a certain special hamburger for that discerning woman.

The “Great Society” Speech delivered fifty years ago

It was just six months after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy that President Lyndon Johnson came to the University of Michigan to deliver the commencement address on May 22, 1964. Speaking in Michigan Stadium, he delivered a historic speech that put forth a vision for a better society that went beyond the piecemeal efforts to address racism and social inequality undertaken previously. Today, exactly fifty years later, we can see a complete absence of that vision and political bravery among those sad souls who call themselves “leaders.” Although Johnson would ultimately compromise himself so deeply in the deals made to keep the Vietnam War from undermining his domestic agenda, I think we can see here an honest effort by a rather conservative and insular man to rise above his limitations and the limitations of his time.

President Johnson said to the students:

“Your imagination, your initiative, and your indignation will determine whether we build a society where progress is the servant of our needs, or a society where old values and new visions are buried under unbridled growth. For in your time we have the opportunity to move not only toward the rich society and the powerful society, but upward to the ‘Great Society'”.

It is interesting that Johnson mentions poverty first and then racism. Unlike self-satisfied politicians who talk of a “lack of tolerance for diversity” Johnson, in his home-grown style, recognized that poverty was the essential issue that had to be addressed.

The “Great Society” Speech

 

 

It is a great pleasure to be here today. This university has been coeducational since 1870, but I do not believe it was on the basis of your accomplishments that a Detroit high school girl said (and I quote), “In choosing a college, you first have to decide whether you want a coeducational school or an educational school.” Well, we can find both here at Michigan, although perhaps at different hours. I came out here today very anxious to meet the Michigan student whose father told a friend of mine that his son’s education had been a real value. It stopped his mother from bragging about him.

I have come today from the turmoil of your capital to the tranquility of your campus to speak about the future of your country. The purpose of protecting the life of our Nation and preserving the liberty of our citizens is to pursue the happiness of our people. Our success in that pursuit is the test of our success as a Nation.

For a century we labored to settle and to subdue a continent. For half a century we called upon unbounded invention and untiring industry to create an order of plenty for all of our people. The challenge of the next half century is whether we have the wisdom to use that wealth to enrich and elevate our national life, and to advance the quality of our American civilization.

Your imagination and your initiative and your indignation will determine whether we build a society where progress is the servant of our needs, or a society where old values and new visions are buried under unbridled growth. For in your time we have the opportunity to move not only toward the rich society and the powerful society, but upward to the Great Society.

The Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all. It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are totally committed in our time. But that is just the beginning.

The Great Society is a place where every child can find knowledge to enrich his mind and to enlarge his talents. It is a place where leisure is a welcome chance to build and reflect, not a feared cause of boredom and restlessness. It is a place where the city of man serves not only the needs of the body and the demands of commerce but the desire for beauty and the hunger for community. It is a place where man can renew contact with nature. It is a place which honors creation for its own sake and for what is adds to the understanding of the race. It is a place where men are more concerned with the quality of their goals than the quantity of their goods.

But most of all, the Great Society is not a safe harbor, a resting place, a final objective, a finished work. It is a challenge constantly renewed, beckoning us toward a destiny where the meaning of our lives matches the marvelous products of our labor.

So I want to talk to you today about three places where we begin to build the Great Society — in our cities, in our countryside, and in our classrooms.

Many of you will live to see the day, perhaps 50 years from now, when there will be 400 million Americans — four-fifths of them in urban areas. In the remainder of this century urban population will double, city land will double, and we will have to build homes and highways and facilities equal to all those built since this country was first settled. So in the next 40 years we must re-build the entire urban United States.

Aristotle said: “Men come together in cities in order to live, but they remain together in order to live the good life.” It is harder and harder to live the good life in American cities today. The catalog of ills is long: there is the decay of the centers and the despoiling of the suburbs. There is not enough housing for our people or transportation for our traffic. Open land is vanishing and old landmarks are violated. Worst of all expansion is eroding these precious and time honored values of community with neighbors and communion with nature. The loss of these values breeds loneliness and boredom and indifference.

And our society will never be great until our cities are great. Today the frontier of imagination and innovation is inside those cities and not beyond their borders. New experiments are already going on. It will be the task of your generation to make the American city a place where future generations will come, not only to live, but to live the good life. And I understand that if I stayed here tonight I would see that Michigan students are really doing their best to live the good life.

This is the place where the Peace Corps was started.

It is inspiring to see how all of you, while you are in this country, are trying so hard to live at the level of the people.

A second place where we begin to build the Great Society is in our countryside. We have always prided ourselves on being not only America the strong and America the free, but America the beautiful. Today that beauty is in danger. The water we drink, the food we eat, the very air that we breathe, are threatened with pollution. Our parks are overcrowded, our seashores overburdened. Green fields and dense forests are disappearing.

A few years ago we were greatly concerned about the “Ugly American.” Today we must act to prevent an ugly America.

For once the battle is lost, once our natural splendor is destroyed, it can never be recaptured. And once man can no longer walk with beauty or wonder at nature his spirit will wither and his sustenance be wasted.

A third place to build the Great Society is in the classrooms of America. There your children’s lives will be shaped. Our society will not be great until every young mind is set free to scan the farthest reaches of thought and imagination. We are still far from that goal. Today, 8 million adult Americans, more than the entire population of Michigan, have not finished 5 years of school. Nearly 20 million have not finished 8 years of school. Nearly 54 million — more than one quarter of all America — have not even finished high school.

Each year more than 100,000 high school graduates, with proved ability, do not enter college because they cannot afford it. And if we cannot educate today’s youth, what will we do in 1970 when elementary school enrollment will be 5 million greater than 1960? And high school enrollment will rise by 5 million. And college enrollment will increase by more than 3 million.

In many places, classrooms are overcrowded and curricula are outdated. Most of our qualified teachers are underpaid and many of our paid teachers are unqualified. So we must give every child a place to sit and a teacher to learn from. Poverty must not be a bar to learning, and learning must offer an escape from poverty.

But more classrooms and more teachers are not enough. We must seek an educational system which grows in excellence as it grows in size. This means better training for our teachers. It means preparing youth to enjoy their hours of leisure as well as their hours of labor. It means exploring new techniques of teaching, to find new ways to stimulate the love of learning and the capacity for creation.

These are three of the central issues of the Great Society. While our Government has many programs directed at those issues, I do not pretend that we have the full answer to those problems. But I do promise this: We are going to assemble the best thought and the broadest knowledge from all over the world to find those answers for America.

I intend to establish working groups to prepare a series of White House conferences and meetings — on the cities, on natural beauty, on the quality of education, and on other emerging challenges. And from these meetings and from this inspiration and from these studies we will begin to set our course toward the Great Society.

The solution to these problems does not rest on a massive program in Washington, nor can it rely solely on the strained resources of local authority. They require us to create new concepts of cooperation, a creative federalism, between the National Capital and the leaders of local communities.

Woodrow Wilson once wrote: “Every man sent out from his university should be a man of his Nation as well as a man of his time.”

Within your lifetime powerful forces, already loosed, will take us toward a way of life beyond the realm of our experience, almost beyond the bounds of our imagination.

For better or for worse, your generation has been appointed by history to deal with those problems and to lead America toward a new age. You have the chance never before afforded to any people in any age. You can help build a society where the demands of morality, and the needs of the spirit, can be realized in the life of the Nation.

So, will you join in the battle to give every citizen the full equality which God enjoins and the law requires, whatever his belief, or race, or the color of his skin?

Will you join in the battle to give every citizen an escape from the crushing weight of poverty?

Will you join in the battle to make it possible for all nations to live in enduring peace — as neighbors and not as mortal enemies?

Will you join in the battle to build the Great Society, to prove that our material progress is only the foundation on which we will build a richer life of mind and spirit?

There are those timid souls that say this battle cannot be won; that we are condemned to a soulless wealth. I do not agree. We have the power to shape the civilization that we want. But we need your will and your labor and your hearts, if we are to build that kind of society.

Those who came to this land sought to build more than just a new country. They sought a new world. So I have come here today to your campus to say that you can make their vision our reality. So let us from this moment begin our work so that in the future men will look back and say: It was then, after a long and weary way, that man turned the exploits of his genius to the full enrichment of his life.

Read more

May 23, 2014

Emanuel Pastreich

Confusing “technology” with “science” is a very serious mistake and one of the greatest risks of our age. The 18^th century was the age of science when great researchers like Isaac Newton sought out the basic principles of physics through the careful investigation of the universe. The world was transformed by the rational and considered study of the material world in that century. It was an age of discovery and the drive to understand informed society. But the 18^th century was not more advanced than our age in terms of technology. The various technologies we enjoy today, like antibiotics, the telephone and the automobile were not available and many suffered as a result.

By contrast, we live today in an age of technology, an age in which technology is advancing at an exponential rate, racing beyond the ability of our culture, our society and our own brains to respond and to adapt to that change. It is a profoundly dangerous moment as our society crashes forward into a future we do not understand in the slightest. But, although we can say this is an age of technology, it is not an age of science in the slightest. If anything the use of new media and glossy presentations of reality has led to a profound sloppiness on the part of many people in terms of how they perceive the world. We foolishly think that if something looks appealing on the computer screen, it must be true, or superior. Our scientific thinking, how we deduce the truth from the careful investigation of facts, has become sloppy, but out technology keeps accelerating beyond our control. If we confuse this “technological” advancement with “science” we will not be aware of just how blind we have become. And that is far more dangerous. It is dangerous to be blind. It is far more dangerous to be blind, but to be unaware that one is blind. That is where we are now.

Larry Wilkerson, former colonel and chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, appeared on “The Real News” program’s  “Reality Asserts itself” with Senior Editor Paul Jay on May 12, 2014 to talk about the environment and security in East Asia. His remarks focus on the implications of climate change for US-China relations, and draws on the themes of the Asia Institute seminar in Washington D.C. “The United States Re-balancing in East Asia: Adopting a 100-year Time-Frame”on the Pacific Pivot at which he was a speaker.

Wilkerson states:

“Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, United States Commander for the Pacifc Command–Probably the most influential man in terms of immediate US. China policy and US Asia–he said this recently: 

‘China and the United States probably have more in common than they have different. It is not a large majority, but it is a majority.’

The problem that we have, the challenge that we have is to deal with is the fiction created by that minority. Those issues where we don’t agree. Well that is what a great states pact does. It says: “We are going to push those issues aside,work on them if we can in the corridors, and try to fix what we can.

But we have got to have a relationship that basically brings the two together, because you can’t do it alone. You can’t. No country can do  it alone, meet the challenges of this century which are huge.

If [it is the case that policy makers look at China as just another predator] then let just keep being predators and watch the planet cast us off.  Because the planet will cast us off, or at least a sizable majority of us. There is no question in my mind about that. The planet will go one, as it went on after the dinosaurs. But human life might not. And that is the   nature of the challenge we confront in this century. In this century: In my grandchildren’s lifespan, major impacts will begin to occur, indeed may already be occurring. 

Nations like Tokelau understand that they are going to be underwater, and that they have to relocate their whole populations. These things are going to occur with a frequency and a drama that is going to convince everyone. But is it going to be too late? 

No country can do it alone. 

These problems are huge. 

video