Here a link to\u00a0the special report from Carnegie Endowment entitled<\/p>\n
“Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China”<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Council on Foreign Relations<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (by\u00a0Robert D. Blackwill & Ashley J. Tellis)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n which has been much discussed recently.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n I have not read it all, but it strikes me as a rather complex document. In\u00a0parts it seems rather positive in direction:<\/p>\n “In this context, take into account the negative consequences for each “With this in mind, the U.S.-China discourse should be more But at the same time there are multiple sections in which a militaristic response, a modified containment policy, is proposed without any particular justification.<\/p>\n As I have said before, China is 1 in 5 people in the world. It is integrated into the global economy at every level. There is no containment possible. But don’t worry, there is plenty of work to do. Start with climate change. Climate change is mentioned only three times in the document, and there only as one of a list of areas for possible cooperation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Here a link to\u00a0the special report from Carnegie Endowment entitled “Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China” Council on Foreign Relations (by\u00a0Robert D. Blackwill & Ashley J. Tellis) which has been much discussed recently. I have not read it all, but it strikes me as a rather complex document. In\u00a0parts it seems … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9296425,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[60672653],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4970","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-today-in-china"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4970","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9296425"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4970"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4970\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4970"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4970"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/green-liberty.org\/circlesandsquares\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4970"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\ncountry\u2019s formidable domestic challenges if the United States and
\nChina seriously mismanage their relationship. Imagine the tumultuous
\neffects on the global economy. Consider the dramatic increase in tension
\nthroughout Asia and the fact that no country in this vast region
\nwants to have to choose between China and the United States. Envision
\nthe corrosive impact on U.S.-China collaboration on climate change.
\nPicture the fallout over attempts to deal with the nuclear weapons programs\u00a0of North Korea and Iran.”<\/p>\n
\ncandid, high level, and private than current practice\u2014no rows of officials
\nprincipally trading sermons across the table in Washington or
\nBeijing. Bureaucracies wish to do today what they did yesterday, and
\nwish to do tomorrow what they did today. It is, therefore, inevitable
\nthat representatives from Washington and Beijing routinely mount
\nbills of indictment regarding the other side. All are familiar with these
\ncalcified and endlessly repeated talking points.”<\/p>\n